By Staff Reporter
In the rolling hills of Sonoma County, California, where the Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria operate one of the state’s most lucrative casinos, Tribal Chairman Greg Sarris has built an empire on promises of cultural revival and economic empowerment. Yet, beneath the veneer of sovereignty and tradition lies a troubling legacy of alleged political maneuvering, identity deception, and internal purges that have drawn sharp criticism from fellow tribal leaders, activists, and even members of his own community. As Sarris wields the tribe’s gaming revenues like a political weapon, questions swirl: Is this leadership, or a calculated corruption that undermines the very sovereignty he claims to champion?
The Pretendian at the Helm: Questions of Legitimacy
Sarris, a celebrated novelist and Sonoma State University professor, rose to prominence as the public face of Graton Rancheria after the tribe’s federal restoration in 2000. But his Native heritage has long been under scrutiny. Critics, including independent researcher Marilee Montgomery, allege that Sarris lacks any verifiable Coast Miwok or Southern Pomo ancestry—the very bloodlines central to the tribe’s identity. Drawing on U.S. Census records and genealogical data, Montgomery’s investigation claims Sarris’s lineage traces to Caucasian, Filipino, and other non-Native sources, labeling him a “Pretendian” who has fraudulently positioned himself as a tribal leader. In a formal letter to the U.S. Department of the Interior, Montgomery called for his de-certification, arguing that his leadership perpetuates a “wide-ranging identity fraud” that disqualifies him from office.
This isn’t mere academic debate; it’s a direct assault on tribal integrity. Anti-casino activists have echoed these claims, with one group formally challenging Sarris’s ancestry to the Bureau of Indian Affairs in 2010, asserting he has “Caucasian, Filipino and other ancestry.” Sarris has dismissed such accusations as politically motivated smears from rivals eyeing Graton’s casino spoils. Yet, the persistence of these allegations—spanning over a decade—raises profound doubts about whether Graton’s leadership is rooted in authentic indigeneity or opportunistic reinvention.
Buying Silence: Weaponizing Casino Dollars Against Rival Tribes
Perhaps the most damning charge against Sarris is his alleged use of Graton’s casino profits to sabotage other tribes’ quests for federal recognition. The Muwekma Ohlone Tribe, whose ancestral lands span the San Francisco Bay Area, has endured a decades-long battle for reaffirmation after an administrative error omitted them from the BIA’s 1978 list of recognized tribes. Enter Sarris: According to tribal activists and Muwekma Chairwoman Charlene Nijmeh, he has orchestrated a covert campaign of political donations to derail their efforts, funneling millions from Graton and allied gaming tribes to key lawmakers.
In 2022, Sarris reportedly urged State Senator Bill Dodd to kill SJR-13, a resolution supporting Muwekma recognition, after Dodd received contributions from tribes like Pechanga and Yocha Dehe—donors allegedly coordinated by Sarris. Similar tactics targeted federal figures: Rep. Zoe Lofgren reversed her long-standing support for Muwekma in late 2022, penning a letter opposing their sovereignty just as Graton-linked funds flowed to her campaigns. Nijmeh recently decried this as a “corruption problem,” not an “evidence problem,” accusing Sarris of spending millions to “buy politicians” like Lofgren and retiring Rep. Anna Eshoo. As recently as August 2024, Lofgren’s interference in a San Jose City Council resolution backing Muwekma—hours before a vote—fueled fresh outrage, with tribal leaders linking it to casino interests fearing competition.
Sarris’s opposition extends beyond Muwekma. In 2024, he vocally criticized the Koi Nation’s proposed $600 million Shiloh Casino in Sonoma County, positioning Graton as a protector of local interests while conveniently safeguarding its monopoly. Critics see this as predatory tribalism: Using gaming wealth to “genocide” non-casino tribes out of existence, as one Stanford activist put it. If true, it’s not just corruption—it’s a betrayal of pan-Indian solidarity, turning federal recognition into a zero-sum game rigged by the house.
Internal Purges: Disenrollment as a Tool of Tyranny
Corruption isn’t confined to external politics; Sarris faces accusations of authoritarianism within Graton’s borders. Tribal elder Lezlie Grigone, a former secretary, has publicly testified to a culture of fear under Sarris’s rule. In 2013, Grigone filed a formal complaint against him for “abuses and offenses,” including malicious disenrollments that stripped members of citizenship, benefits, and cultural ties. She described a “two strikes rule” where minor infractions—like an angry phone call—could lead to expulsion, and alleged personal vendettas, including threats to her family.
Grigone’s ouster from office and an eight-year sanction followed her challenge, with no hearings held despite acknowledgments from tribal officials. She warned of a “vile” atmosphere where members live in terror of Sarris’s whims, unmitigated by the Indian Civil Rights Act or BIA oversight. This echoes broader “disenrollment epidemics” plaguing casino-rich tribes, where leaders purge “undesirables” to inflate per capita payouts—a practice CBS investigations tied to Graton as early as 2012.
Sarris’s defenders point to his role in restoring the tribe’s sovereignty and building the $500 million Graton Resort & Casino. But when prosperity comes at the cost of due process and inclusion, it reeks of kleptocracy dressed in feathers.
The Boxer-Anderson Fiasco: Naivety or Complicity?
Sarris’s early tenure was marred by a high-profile swindle that exposed his vulnerability—or willingness—to political insiders. In 2002, he hired Platinum Advisors, led by Douglas Boxer (son of then-Sen. Barbara Boxer) and lobbyist Darius Anderson, to secure land for the casino. Leveraging Boxer’s family ties—Boxer had championed Graton’s restoration—Sarris trusted them implicitly. The tribe shelled out $1.2 million, only for arbitrators in 2018 to rule the duo had defrauded them by steering the purchase of worthless swamp land and cutting secret deals with Las Vegas interests.
Judges found breaches of loyalty, including misrepresentations and undisclosed consulting fees that sabotaged better bids. Anderson later demanded $43 million from casino revenues, a claim courts dismissed as baseless. Sarris testified the tribe feared “political retaliation,” a chilling admission of how D.C. connections can bully tribes into silence. While Sarris was more victim than villain here, his blind faith in these powerbrokers underscores a pattern: Prioritizing elite alliances over fiduciary duty, leaving Graton’s members to foot the bill.
A Call for Reckoning
Greg Sarris’s three-decade grip on Graton Rancheria has delivered wealth but at a steep moral price. From fabricated heritage to bought politicians and purged dissenters, his leadership embodies the dark side of tribal gaming: Corruption that erodes trust, fractures communities, and mocks the sovereignty struggles of less fortunate kin. As Muwekma’s horseback ride to Washington demands justice, it’s time for the BIA, Congress, and Native advocates to scrutinize Sarris—not as a novelist’s hero, but as a chairman whose empire may rest on sand.
The stakes are existential. If gaming tribes like Graton can stifle recognition and silence critics with cash, what hope remains for the un-casinoed? Sarris must face investigation, or step aside. Native America deserves better than a chairman who plays king while others play pawn.
Be the first to comment